by ApocalypseNow
Below I response Walter Lo Cascio, then I give my impression:
---
After waiting a bit, 'to calm people and allowing someone to take a few petty satisfaction, here I am to be bound by the court.
But before you make a few considerations:
The picture was not unusual this is true and I apologize, but since it was published only on the Internet has never been the subject of this competition before, much less has been published in magazines, newspapers or other paper. I was wrong about this, in fact, talking with the director of NG, for unpublished photos, is any work that is not never been published, both on the web or on any other site.
If I had been in bad faith, July 10, when the preparation of NG phoned me to inform me that my photo was a winner, I'd worked hard to remove the image in question from all sites internet, instead it is in total candor.
Being very fond of this shot I wanted to try to understand that finding
could have on an audience described as that of NG.
The result you saw.
Regarding the charge of editing, I would ask to the jury, and detractors, which is the boundary beyond which an image is defined retouched.
I am sure that none of the photos of the competition as it was sent out of the camera, so the concept of touch-up should be revised, otherwise it should reject all submitted photos.
For my part, I have sent to the Director of NG, the original photo, I do not want to prove to anyone if that was sky was true or false! Dr. Pepe, you know 'the truth about it.
What strikes me is the bitterness with which many critics have thrown at me.
In any case, if I did something in where someone can see the lack of fairness, was in complete good faith and, if anything, a bit 'of superficiality, which of course I apologize to you all!
I am totally convinced that my photos did not observe the fees provided for in the regulations, must be completely expelled.
We are awaiting the final verdict of the jury, the winning photos on the new section Landscapes.
Walter Lo Cascio
---
1) You told with affection when he took the picture, lying blatantly (original photo, taken from the car without even stopping, etc.)
2) When I popped out the first allegations about fake photo, just like you denied the twins k , promising to show the raw (which do not, at the end of games)
3) Admit your fault, when you are now with their backs to the wall, but instead of bowing his head they make you say "are all bootleg! 11, 1." That some other photo was doctored I can not exclude, but to say that they are all only to undermine its shares is sad.
You pick the next Photoshop Contest Wednesday, NGI Forum Section Agora.
ApocalypseNow
